1 |
On Thursday, September 22, 2011 14:23:55 Tim Harder wrote: |
2 |
> On 2011-09-22 Thu 01:53, Ulrich Mueller wrote: |
3 |
> > In the course of the old-style to new-style transition of virtuals, |
4 |
> > I had taken maintainership of several new-style virtual packages. |
5 |
> > |
6 |
> > After several months have passed without any bugs showing up, I |
7 |
> > |
8 |
> > believe it's time that I drop maintainership of these: |
9 |
> > virtual/cron |
10 |
> > virtual/dev-manager |
11 |
> > virtual/inetd |
12 |
> > virtual/libc |
13 |
> > virtual/linux-sources |
14 |
> > virtual/man |
15 |
> > virtual/os-headers |
16 |
> > virtual/package-manager |
17 |
> > virtual/skkserv |
18 |
> > virtual/ssh |
19 |
> > virtual/w3m |
20 |
> > |
21 |
> > As these are virtuals, I won't expect that there will be much |
22 |
> > maintenance required. Also, all of them will fall back to (at least) |
23 |
> > one herd. Please check the respective metadata.xml files for details. |
24 |
> |
25 |
> Personally I don't see why all of these need specific maintainers beyond |
26 |
> the herds they fall under already, especially if they are very low |
27 |
> maintenance. |
28 |
|
29 |
right. if they don't have herds, then almost all of these are obvious as to |
30 |
which they should get added to. |
31 |
-mike |