| 1 |
On Wed, 2008-05-07 at 16:23 +0300, Mart Raudsepp wrote: |
| 2 |
> I do realize one would remove build-time dependencies and the toolchain |
| 3 |
> on an embedded system on deployment anyway, but this means gcc USE=nocxx |
| 4 |
> USE flag is pretty much useless, while it would be nice to use it to |
| 5 |
> ensure that nothing sneaks in during development that depends on the C++ |
| 6 |
> standard library easily instead of finding things break later. |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
It's a pain in the ass for Release Engineering, too. At this point, |
| 9 |
we're looking into how we need to modify the bootstrap sequence to |
| 10 |
accommodate people using lzma for system (and lower) packages. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=220074 |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
We're already getting reports of this due to someone deciding that it'd |
| 15 |
be a good idea to use lzma for our daily portage snapshots without any |
| 16 |
discussion here. Luckily, we still have the other tarballs to use, too. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
-- |
| 19 |
Chris Gianelloni |
| 20 |
Release Engineering Strategic Lead |
| 21 |
Games Developer |
Archives