| 1 |
Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Thu, 12 Jun 2008 18:32:35 +0100 |
| 3 |
> George Prowse <cokehabit@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 4 |
>> If the bickering is stopping development then maybe it should be |
| 5 |
>> given to a 3rd party to complete and have the last word. |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> Considering third parties have at best contributed a few small patches, |
| 8 |
> I don't see that getting very far... If a third party's genuinely |
| 9 |
> prepared to take over and do the work they're more than welcome to. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
I dont see that the work isn't done, I see arguing about standards and |
| 12 |
implementations and as there is 3 voices in this and little is being |
| 13 |
decided then anything that can't be sorted should be submitted for |
| 14 |
review and decisions taken. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
There are things that I don't understand about the EAPI structure (why |
| 17 |
versions may be incompatible with each other) but it seems like we are |
| 18 |
heading for differing standards soon. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Feel free to flame and call me a fool... |
| 21 |
-- |
| 22 |
gentoo-dev@l.g.o mailing list |
Archives