| 1 |
On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 7:13 PM, Walter Dnes <waltdnes@××××××××.org> wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Sat, Jul 14, 2012 at 01:49:32AM +0300, Maxim Kammerer wrote |
| 3 |
>> On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 11:12 PM, Richard Yao <ryao@g.o> wrote: |
| 4 |
>> > mdev would need to switch to the netlink hotplug interface. |
| 5 |
>> |
| 6 |
>> I think that's quite unlikely, since mdev is not a daemon. Perhaps by |
| 7 |
>> the time /proc/sys/kernel/hotplug is gone, mdev advocates will have |
| 8 |
>> settled on some early udev fork. [1] |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> Do you realize this would effectively kill linux in the embedded |
| 11 |
> device area? Udev, even without the systemd code, is simply to large |
| 12 |
> for embedded devices. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
The guys from ProFUSION would disagree with you: |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
http://profusion.mobi/ |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
It is a "a software development company focused on embedded systems", |
| 19 |
and several of its employees contribute code and ideas for systemd, so |
| 20 |
they also use udev. For embedded systems. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
The idea that udev "is simply to large" is simply incorrect, I believe. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
Regards. |
| 25 |
-- |
| 26 |
Canek Peláez Valdés |
| 27 |
Posgrado en Ciencia e Ingeniería de la Computación |
| 28 |
Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México |
Archives