| 1 |
On 01/01/2013 22:29, Tony "Chainsaw" Vroon wrote: |
| 2 |
> That sounds like a clear win. If it has survived the tinderboxing there |
| 3 |
> likely isn't much to hold you back. As non-contentious topics sometimes |
| 4 |
> end up with no replies at all... consider 48 hours of radio silence an |
| 5 |
> implicit yes. |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
It didn't survive. I'm not sure if all the bugs have been fixed now but |
| 8 |
at some point I had to stop the tinderboxing because it was hitting |
| 9 |
package failures, and then it was "fixed for next version" — which was |
| 10 |
difficult to test. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
So I would veto this _for the moment_. (I'd be happy to run another test |
| 13 |
_after_ the glibc-2.17 one.) |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
-- |
| 16 |
Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes |
| 17 |
flameeyes@×××××××××.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/ |
Archives