| 1 |
On Fri, 27 Jan 2017 12:54:07 -0500 |
| 2 |
Michael Orlitzky <mjo@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> That satisfies most of the requirements that *I* have for user and |
| 5 |
> group management on the system. Compared to the GLEP: |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> * EUSERS + EGROUPS: replaced by (R)DEPEND. |
| 8 |
> * Defining Accounts: anyone can add a new package already. |
| 9 |
> * FEATURES=noautoaccts: use package.provided instead. |
| 10 |
> * Local Overrides: use an overlay. |
| 11 |
> * users-update: cleanup can be done with --depclean now. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
+1 |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
except package.provided which will probably be a mess to handle, but I |
| 16 |
dont see why disabling it is a good idea: I'm assuming package will |
| 17 |
misbehave at runtime if the user/group is missing |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
note that i dont think it fixes ROOT!=/ missing users though but |
| 20 |
probably paves the way for it |
Archives