1 |
Daniel Robbins wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
>On Mon, Sep 24, 2001 at 08:35:11PM +0200, Karl Trygve Kalleberg wrote: |
4 |
> |
5 |
>>The dodoc command in ebuilds should handle HTML files a lot better than it |
6 |
>>does now. Instead of naively compressing html files, they should be put |
7 |
>>/usr/share/doc/${P}/html instead. This would be a very simple fix, if it |
8 |
>>wasn't for the fact that we sometimes want to copy entire HTML-trees with |
9 |
>>image files and all (such as the documentation for python or qt). |
10 |
>> |
11 |
> |
12 |
>I'm ok with doing this; would you be willing to improve dodoc and post your |
13 |
>improvements here? As long as they are sane, I doubt anyone will complain |
14 |
>and I'll roll them into the next version of Portage. |
15 |
> |
16 |
>Best Regards, |
17 |
> |
18 |
Browsers can handle .html.gz, but the links will need to be modified. |
19 |
|
20 |
Also i noticed that mozilla 0.9.4 prompt's to save files by default, i |
21 |
know that it can handle gzip comressed content however. |