| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA256 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
On 27/03/12 04:04 AM, Ian Whyman wrote: |
| 5 |
> On 27 March 2012 08:33, Dirkjan Ochtman <djc@g.o> wrote: |
| 6 |
>> On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 20:44, Alec Warner <antarus@g.o> |
| 7 |
>> wrote: |
| 8 |
>>>> Long term, we may want to consider porting pybugz to use |
| 9 |
>>>> Bugzilla's XML-RPC api to avoid such breakage. |
| 10 |
>>> |
| 11 |
>>> XML-RPC is shit. |
| 12 |
>> |
| 13 |
>> https://wiki.mozilla.org/Bugzilla:REST_API |
| 14 |
>> |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> Shame that it requires custom patches to BZ, personally I think |
| 17 |
> the preferable (and offically supported) method would be |
| 18 |
> JSON-RPC[1] |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> Ian |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> 1.http://www.bugzilla.org/docs/4.0/en/html/api/Bugzilla/WebService/Server/JSONRPC.html |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
> |
| 25 |
What about all of the above? :D Shouldn't be hard to use the various |
| 26 |
support libs to dump the request object to either format, right? |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
(no, i'm not volunteering) |
| 29 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 30 |
Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
iF4EAREIAAYFAk9xxhoACgkQAJxUfCtlWe0nVwEA6DIm5IcHaxZuFUZz7ETOq8o3 |
| 33 |
zzVOBJqP84SY+FQv8xkBALlNtfKSgQLPR0Qoyc3/nUqt8hAuvOF0jOIEx9r0FVMm |
| 34 |
=wYwb |
| 35 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
Archives