1 |
On Monday 03 May 2010 03:31:08 Michał Górny wrote: |
2 |
> On Sun, 2 May 2010 23:57:53 +0200 Enrico Weigelt wrote: |
3 |
> > * Alec Warner <antarus@g.o> schrieb: |
4 |
> > > Except as stated they are not fixed (as Fabian pointed out). I'm |
5 |
> > > happy to support something like setting ROOT_UID and ROOT_GID in |
6 |
> > > gentoo-x86 profiles and using those. Then if you want to do |
7 |
> > > something utterly ridiculous to your system you can just set the |
8 |
> > > appropriate variables. |
9 |
> > |
10 |
> > ACK. But it should also be possible to specify names here |
11 |
> > (not just numerical IDs), just in case the underlying kernel |
12 |
> > doesnt have numerical UIDs at all ... |
13 |
> |
14 |
> Most tools which would use these variables (chown, find, install) |
15 |
> support both numerical UIDs and usernames passed in the same way. |
16 |
|
17 |
technically speaking, all values given to chown/etc... get looked up as a name |
18 |
first even if it is only numbers. so if you named an account "0", then `chown |
19 |
0 foo` would not change it to UID 0, it would change it to the UID of the |
20 |
account named "0". |
21 |
|
22 |
ROOT_{USER,GROUP} makes more sense than ROOT_{UID,GID} |
23 |
-mike |