Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Donnie Berkholz <spyderous@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Replacing cpu-feature USE flags
Date: Thu, 06 Jul 2006 12:04:48
Message-Id: 44ACFAD3.20000@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Replacing cpu-feature USE flags by "Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò"
1 Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:
2 > On Thursday 06 July 2006 13:40, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
3 >> How will you handle non-gcc compilers?
4 > We don't support any, to start with.
5 >
6 > But ICC I'm pretty sure behaves like GCC, and whatever else we'd go by
7 > supporting should likely do the same.
8 >
9 > But again, we don't support any, so it's up to whoever wants to support them
10 > to find a solution, I'd say.
11
12 Well, there are enough in the tree that you should at least make sure
13 they don't completely break and error out when passing them invalid
14 flags, even if you fail to auto-enable mmx/sse/whatever. You could do if
15 [[ $(tc-getCC) != *gcc* ]] or something...
16
17 Thanks,
18 Donnie

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Replacing cpu-feature USE flags "Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò" <flameeyes@g.o>