1 |
Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
2 |
> If you're the sort that writes good ChangeLog messages anyway, there's |
3 |
> nothing wrong with reusing them as the commit message. If you have a |
4 |
> really really good reason for not using a ChangeLog message, or if you |
5 |
> haven't yet written a shell alias for reusing ChangeLog messages for |
6 |
> commits, you still need to come up with something for the commit |
7 |
> message. |
8 |
|
9 |
Personaly I find it a little bit annoying to write changes twise. One |
10 |
time in Changelog and one time in --commitmsg. How about using the |
11 |
commitmsg for Changelog as default, but if a Changelog entry already |
12 |
exists, then write nothing to Changelog. |
13 |
|
14 |
Regards, |
15 |
|
16 |
Markus Rothe |