| 1 |
>>>>> On Sun, 6 Dec 2015, James Le Cuirot wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
>> > # EAPI=4 is required for meaningful MULTILIB_USEDEP. |
| 4 |
>> > case ${EAPI:-0} in |
| 5 |
>> > - 4|5) ;; |
| 6 |
>> > + [456]) ;; |
| 7 |
>> > *) die "EAPI=${EAPI} is not supported" ;; |
| 8 |
>> > esac |
| 9 |
>> |
| 10 |
>> Why not write this as 4|5|6) for better readability? It's not even |
| 11 |
>> shorter with the brackets. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
> Or [4-6]) perhaps? It would not get any longer for later versions. ;) |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
I'd rather avoid any syntax that suggests that EAPI names are single |
| 16 |
characters. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Ulrich |
Archives