| 1 |
On 09/18/2015 12:56 PM, Alexis Ballier wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Fri, 18 Sep 2015 11:58:09 +0200 |
| 3 |
> hasufell <hasufell@g.o> wrote: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
>> On 09/18/2015 11:55 AM, Duncan wrote: |
| 6 |
>>> Alexis Ballier posted on Fri, 18 Sep 2015 11:04:19 +0200 as |
| 7 |
>>> excerpted: |
| 8 |
>>> |
| 9 |
>>>>> Keep in mind what this implies when you change these dependencies |
| 10 |
>>>>> without bumping the ebuilds that use them. |
| 11 |
>>>> |
| 12 |
>>>> only way i see these changing is with a new ros_messages_*** |
| 13 |
>>>> useflag, which will cause a rebuild anyway |
| 14 |
>>> |
| 15 |
>>> ?? Only with --newuse or similar, tho? Otherwise USE (or |
| 16 |
>>> USE_EXPAND here) changes don't trigger rebuilds, do they? |
| 17 |
>>> |
| 18 |
>> |
| 19 |
>> Correct. It's not good to rely on this and expect users to have a |
| 20 |
>> certain update pattern or even use a particular PM. |
| 21 |
>> |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> then they wont have the messages if they don't rebuild, and |
| 24 |
> cat/pkg[ros_messages_newthing] deps wont be satisfied and the pm will |
| 25 |
> do the right thing by rebuilding. |
| 26 |
> nothing to worry about, really. |
| 27 |
> |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
cat/pkg[ros_messages_newthing] will not be in users VDB until you |
| 30 |
revbump cat/pkg, so I don't think it's that easy. |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
For adding a USE flag, you don't necessarily need a revbump, but you |
| 33 |
can't hide another dep-fix behind a USE-flag addition. |
Archives