| 1 |
Patrick Lauer: |
| 2 |
> On Friday 16 January 2015 18:29:08 hasufell wrote: |
| 3 |
>> Patrick Lauer: |
| 4 |
>>> On 01/16/15 23:26, hasufell wrote: |
| 5 |
>>>> Patrick Lauer (patrick): |
| 6 |
>>>>> patrick 15/01/16 04:16:55 |
| 7 |
>>>>> |
| 8 |
>>>>> Modified: ChangeLog |
| 9 |
>>>>> Added: libuv-1.2.1.ebuild |
| 10 |
>>>>> Log: |
| 11 |
>>>>> Bump |
| 12 |
>>>> |
| 13 |
>>>> I expect people to ask me for review if they bump any of my packages. |
| 14 |
>>>> That includes QA team members. |
| 15 |
>>> |
| 16 |
>>> Are you always in such a bad mood? |
| 17 |
>> |
| 18 |
>> Do you, as QA team member, think that a review workflow improves quality? |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> No. |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> Bureaucracy does not improve quality by itself. |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
Patrick, I am really sorry, but this answer made me laugh and cry. |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
A review workflow is a fundamental concept in programming methodology |
| 28 |
and we have decades of experience that taught us how important it is. |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
I have no words to describe how disappointed I am right now. |
Archives