Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Carsten Lohrke <carlo@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] proposed solution to arches/stable problem
Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2004 18:31:28
Message-Id: 200406222031.18393.carlo@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] proposed solution to arches/stable problem by Aron Griffis
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA1
3
4 On Tuesday 22 June 2004 19:54, Aron Griffis wrote:
5 > Btw, although this is not *as* visible, it would still be very
6 > visible to developers via repoman, which could be modified to warn (or
7 > even require a flag similar to --ignore-other-arches) when jumping
8 > ahead of the maintainer's arch.
9
10 I'm not editing ebuilds via repoman. ;) And it is not as non-invasive as you
11 think. Quite a fey keyword lines would need to be reordered to adhere the new
12 rule - by hand. It is far easier to use +arch and let portage and all tools
13 interpret it as arch (as it is now, maybe printing a warning), until portage,
14 all tools and ebuilds are ready to switch to the new explicit stable feature.
15
16
17 Carsten
18 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
19 Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
20
21 iD8DBQFA2Hr1VwbzmvGLSW8RAmWbAJ9ziGPsXSCyYmFDBNWdFxuCGIEcSQCfZb3D
22 Dtp1K5E4LTHyaUp3dth59BA=
23 =2krz
24 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
25
26 --
27 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies