| 1 |
On Tuesday 29 March 2005 20:04, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 2 |
> I and several others worked out that it'd be a heck of a |
| 3 |
> lot of effort for virtually no gain on the sed issue |
| 4 |
Well.. having new sed inserted in the code as standard calls is not "a lot of |
| 5 |
effort" :) |
| 6 |
Main problem was with perl, for me. |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
And if someone is editing an ebuild with a wrong sed call, fixing it is not a |
| 9 |
lot of effort. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
We just need to make this known, else anybody don't known how to handle |
| 12 |
something like this :) |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Anyway, I'm on the same tune of Stephen :) |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
-- |
| 17 |
Diego "Flameeyes" Pettenò |
| 18 |
http://wwwstud.dsi.unive.it/~dpetteno/ |
Archives