1 |
On 28 March 2012 08:57, Richard Yao <ryao@×××××××××××××.edu> wrote: |
2 |
> |
3 |
> Could we amend this to also include the benefits of ZFS and why you |
4 |
> would want to use XFS or reiserfs instead of ext{2,3,4} as your |
5 |
> filesystem in situations where ZFS is not yet appropriate (e.g. using it |
6 |
> on Gentoo stable)? We could also include documentation on Reiser4 while |
7 |
> we are at it. |
8 |
|
9 |
Thats probably asking a bit much, I've done my experimenting with |
10 |
XFS/reiserfs , the benefits aren't that substantial to be worth the |
11 |
hassle of the negatives. And as for Reiser4, if there's any |
12 |
documentation mentioning that I think it being simply "Don't use |
13 |
Reiser4" adequate enough. |
14 |
|
15 |
Noob Level: Just Use Ext4 |
16 |
Intermediate: Just Use Ext4, use Ext3 or 2 if you want more something |
17 |
else, but ext4 should do the trick |
18 |
Advanced: Entertain the ideas of XFS/reiser if you want, but you're |
19 |
not likely going to see a *lot* of difference over ext4 on its own |
20 |
partition. Not in the long term. |
21 |
|
22 |
I used to advocate JFS, but long term experience with it taught me JFS |
23 |
is fast for new file systems, and gets progressively slower over time. |
24 |
The original IBM JFS had a defrag tool nobody managed to port to Linux |
25 |
so JFS just gets crufty and stays that way. |
26 |
|
27 |
|
28 |
-- |
29 |
Kent |
30 |
|
31 |
perl -e "print substr( \"edrgmaM SPA NOcomil.ic\\@tfrken\", \$_ * 3, |
32 |
3 ) for ( 9,8,0,7,1,6,5,4,3,2 );" |