| 1 |
On Tue, 2 Aug 2016 10:04:46 -0300 |
| 2 |
Guilherme Amadio <amadio@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> On Mon, Aug 01, 2016 at 11:08:47PM +0200, David Seifert wrote: |
| 5 |
> > Dear friends, |
| 6 |
> > while version bumping sci-libs/fftw, I've noticed our CPU_FLAGS_X86 |
| 7 |
> > list could be expanded a bit: |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> I like the idea of expanding the list of CPU_FLAGS_X86, and having flags |
| 10 |
> for other arches too, but I would be in favor of dropping the _X86 |
| 11 |
> suffix and using CPU_FLAGS for all arches. Your machine most likely will |
| 12 |
> only have one kind anyway. Not sure what others think about it, though. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
One kind is the reason why they are split -- so we can hide |
| 15 |
CPU_FLAGS_X86 on non-x86 CPUs etc. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
-- |
| 18 |
Best regards, |
| 19 |
Michał Górny |
| 20 |
<http://dev.gentoo.org/~mgorny/> |
Archives