| 1 |
On Thu, May 27, 2004 at 07:45:32PM -0400, Jon Portnoy wrote: |
| 2 |
> I think a dev-only wiki would be extremely useful. For consolidation |
| 3 |
> purposes, people on the documentation team or devs with spare time could |
| 4 |
> guidexmlify the most important pieces of documentation produced. |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
Knowing the little time spent on GuideXML'ifying documentation I can only |
| 7 |
second the request. Many documentation devs have too little experience with |
| 8 |
ebuild/eclasses so it's difficult to write good documentation about that |
| 9 |
subject. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
A dev wiki could resolve that problem. I do hope that we are able to see the |
| 12 |
"differences" between wiki versions (like "cvs diff" does) because it would |
| 13 |
otherwise be a PITA to maintain the GuideXML'ified documentation. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
Wkr, |
| 16 |
Sven Vermeulen |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
-- |
| 19 |
Bent Hindrup Andersen, Danish MEP, about the Software Patent Directive: |
| 20 |
The approach of the Commission and Council in this directive is shocking. |
| 21 |
They are making full use of all the possibilities of evading democracy that |
| 22 |
the current Community Law provides. <http://lwn.net/Articles/84009/> |
Archives