| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
On 05/26/2012 01:40 PM, Rich Freeman wrote: |
| 5 |
> Perhaps, but in general devs should be fairly free to add new |
| 6 |
> packages to the tree as long as they properly maintain them. If a |
| 7 |
> dev makes a mistake with a newly-added package, then file a bug and |
| 8 |
> they can fix it. If there is a dispute over whether something is a |
| 9 |
> bug then we have QA/Devrel/council/etc. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
That's what I thought. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
To be clear: I'm not suggesting that people don't work together. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
But my point of view was rather that I have to go strictly by the |
| 16 |
projects/herds rules if I want them to be involved in maintenance. |
| 17 |
If not then it's my own fault IF it breaks things and I may be |
| 18 |
punished for that. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
I'm totally clear that I need to contact the herd when I add it to |
| 21 |
metadata.xml, but that was not the question. |
| 22 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 23 |
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) |
| 24 |
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJPwM1JAAoJEFpvPKfnPDWz7SQH/0+nkqxS5R/gc1Kw/b2gTy6m |
| 27 |
PuuSV8ooZTBJhZw8ezdZ8w0qjca3uhm/vo4Z2j8RournKWaBKYq485KJnDAj6Oh5 |
| 28 |
Toa1ap6/+LvzLxrokxE7RC2vSbto2gkwY7nzy3uYAxrECblupQ7dhXmI6mWIyKcr |
| 29 |
33g3YnwilkeIkz86Foj8drPWJby/iHrhccy9i/NDtsXsDNhiPOdikms7MMCwruzI |
| 30 |
dViy0YPWdieSh8FAfUewTs5sTpuM4qjht+sCaZMo/87VmLQWKMW1qWf9Blz+rKhw |
| 31 |
U/q5bLN/jr5b8hijPtCeQyFVnH+a9K6SHFf1+N+rcuJNYceY7NaBu3izwLeBxWY= |
| 32 |
=7unU |
| 33 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
Archives