Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Pacho Ramos <pacho@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Lifting the HOMEPAGE requirement for ebuilds
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2013 21:13:27
Message-Id: 1358197997.2181.13.camel@belkin4
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Lifting the HOMEPAGE requirement for ebuilds by Ian Stakenvicius
1 El lun, 14-01-2013 a las 15:49 -0500, Ian Stakenvicius escribió:
2 > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
3 > Hash: SHA256
4 >
5 > On 14/01/13 03:15 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
6 > > El lun, 14-01-2013 a las 18:15 +0100, hasufell escribió: [...]
7 > >>>> +1 to allow empty/missing HOMEPAGE variable
8 > >>>>
9 > >>>> dead homepage => useless http://gentoo.org => useless
10 > >>>> https://bugs.gentoo.org => too obvious
11 > >>>>
12 > >>>
13 > >>> An empty homepage usually means the package is dead. I'd rather
14 > >>> see the cvs/git/svn url being used as HOMEPAGE in case your
15 > >>> tiny little script has no proj page at all.
16 > >>>
17 > >>
18 > >> No, an empty homepage just means upstream is dead. There are
19 > >> numerous examples of years old packages still working fine
20 > >> without a single update.
21 > >>
22 > >>
23 > >
24 > > Other option is to use "gentoo.org" as HOMEPAGE for that packages
25 > > (as some of them are already doing). But, since people think it's
26 > > useless, why not use as HOMEPAGE
27 > > http://sources.gentoo.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/gentoo-x86/... ?
28 >
29 > Or what about a URL to a wiki.gentoo.org page for dead upstream packages?
30
31 Well, the advantage of using sources.gentoo.org is that people will find
32 there patches and stuff related with the package :/

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature