1 |
El lun, 14-01-2013 a las 15:49 -0500, Ian Stakenvicius escribió: |
2 |
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
3 |
> Hash: SHA256 |
4 |
> |
5 |
> On 14/01/13 03:15 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote: |
6 |
> > El lun, 14-01-2013 a las 18:15 +0100, hasufell escribió: [...] |
7 |
> >>>> +1 to allow empty/missing HOMEPAGE variable |
8 |
> >>>> |
9 |
> >>>> dead homepage => useless http://gentoo.org => useless |
10 |
> >>>> https://bugs.gentoo.org => too obvious |
11 |
> >>>> |
12 |
> >>> |
13 |
> >>> An empty homepage usually means the package is dead. I'd rather |
14 |
> >>> see the cvs/git/svn url being used as HOMEPAGE in case your |
15 |
> >>> tiny little script has no proj page at all. |
16 |
> >>> |
17 |
> >> |
18 |
> >> No, an empty homepage just means upstream is dead. There are |
19 |
> >> numerous examples of years old packages still working fine |
20 |
> >> without a single update. |
21 |
> >> |
22 |
> >> |
23 |
> > |
24 |
> > Other option is to use "gentoo.org" as HOMEPAGE for that packages |
25 |
> > (as some of them are already doing). But, since people think it's |
26 |
> > useless, why not use as HOMEPAGE |
27 |
> > http://sources.gentoo.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/gentoo-x86/... ? |
28 |
> |
29 |
> Or what about a URL to a wiki.gentoo.org page for dead upstream packages? |
30 |
|
31 |
Well, the advantage of using sources.gentoo.org is that people will find |
32 |
there patches and stuff related with the package :/ |