| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
Mike Frysinger wrote: |
| 5 |
| On Friday 11 March 2005 05:05 pm, Donnie Berkholz wrote: |
| 6 |
| |
| 7 |
|>Mike Frysinger wrote: |
| 8 |
|>| On Friday 11 March 2005 02:55 pm, Donnie Berkholz wrote: |
| 9 |
|>| if xterm is expected why virtualize it ? :) |
| 10 |
|> |
| 11 |
|>To stop the whining |
| 12 |
| |
| 13 |
| |
| 14 |
| gotta love that ... well instead of adding cruft to every package, |
| 15 |
what about |
| 16 |
| adding it to xorg ? |
| 17 |
| PDEPEND="|| ( xterm eterm aterm gnome-terminal ... )" |
| 18 |
| it sucks but so does virtual/term ... |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
As much as it pains me, I must agree with Donnie. Adding a virtual/term |
| 21 |
to current xterm functional equivalents may suck, but it sucks less than |
| 22 |
~ trying to track and add all new equivalents that appear in the future |
| 23 |
and add them to xorg. Personally, I think one of the strengths of |
| 24 |
Gentoo is its ability to cope with diverse prefered environments, and |
| 25 |
that we ought to use virtuals wherever we can. All that abstraction |
| 26 |
stuff they talk about in CS lectures and such, you know :-) |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
Andy |
| 29 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 30 |
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux) |
| 31 |
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
iD8DBQFCMg3+Oq80mJ2AvM0RAg6XAJ9BjxKM4mhbmsYEAAeWVrUe+g8UhACgnl0b |
| 34 |
7U0HnHonFB9FYUiIkNv4fmA= |
| 35 |
=f85q |
| 36 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 37 |
-- |
| 38 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives