Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Michał Górny" <mgorny@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Cc: ulm@g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Should "server" be a global use flag?
Date: Mon, 23 May 2011 16:38:14
Message-Id: 20110523183717.2475d284@pomiocik.lan
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Should "server" be a global use flag? by Ulrich Mueller
1 On Mon, 23 May 2011 16:48:15 +0200
2 Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o> wrote:
3
4 > >>>>> On Mon, 23 May 2011, Anthony G Basile wrote:
5 >
6 > > I was looking at use.desc/use.local.desc to see if the "server"
7 > > flag is global or not. I was surprised to see that it is not.
8 > > There are 26 packages that use a local "server" flag and they all
9 > > say something to the effect "Enable ${PN} server support".
10 >
11 > From <http://devmanual.gentoo.org/general-concepts/use-flags/>:
12 >
13 > | If the effect of the USE flag upon pkg-one is substantially
14 > | different from the effect it has upon pkg-two, then the flag is not
15 > | a suitable candidate for being made a global flag. In particular,
16 > | note that if client and server USE flags are ever introduced, they
17 > | can not be global USE flags for this reason.
18
19 With that definition, USE=crypt should definitely not be global.
20
21 --
22 Best regards,
23 Michał Górny

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Should "server" be a global use flag? "Anthony G. Basile" <blueness@g.o>