| 1 |
On Apr 1, 2013 8:53 PM, "Michael Mol" <mikemol@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> On 04/01/2013 01:06 PM, Markos Chandras wrote: |
| 4 |
> > On 1 April 2013 16:32, Philip Webb <purslow@××××××××.net> wrote: |
| 5 |
> >> 130401 Markos Chandras wrote: |
| 6 |
> >>> On 1 April 2013 02:56, Philip Webb <purslow@××××××××.net> wrote: |
| 7 |
> >>>> I have sent a msg to gentoo-user describing how to solve this |
| 8 |
problem. |
| 9 |
> >>>> Perhaps it needs to be mentioned in the news item or wiki entry. |
| 10 |
> >>> So you broke the threading on the original email, |
| 11 |
> >>> you deleted all the previous content, |
| 12 |
> >>> you did not write an appropriate title for your e-mail |
| 13 |
> >>> and then you claim you solved a problem |
| 14 |
> >>> without mentioning what the problem was. |
| 15 |
> >> |
| 16 |
> >> Your response is completely out of place & very impolite. |
| 17 |
> >> I am trying to help improve Gentoo documentation |
| 18 |
> >> & help other users who may face the same problem, |
| 19 |
> >> but without taking unnecessary space on the dev-list. |
| 20 |
> >> I am not happy with the way the Udev-200 update has been documented, |
| 21 |
> >> but I haven't criticised the developer responsible. |
| 22 |
> >> |
| 23 |
> >> Please take the trouble to read what I sent to the user-list : |
| 24 |
> >> |
| 25 |
> > |
| 26 |
> > Oh but of course. This was more than obvious. Posting something to |
| 27 |
> > gentoo-dev just to |
| 28 |
> > inform us that you posted something to gentoo-user without even |
| 29 |
> > mentioning the title. |
| 30 |
> > And then you claim that my reply is out of place. Ok |
| 31 |
> |
| 32 |
> Is this a good time to point out that list archival is still broken? And |
| 33 |
> has been for almost a year? |
| 34 |
> |
| 35 |
I don't see how this is relevant to this discussion. We are aware of that. |
| 36 |
The bug is still open |
Archives