| 1 |
On Sun, 2006-04-16 at 16:42 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: |
| 2 |
> well the logical thing would be to go to bugzilla and search for "cccc" ... |
| 3 |
> and guess what ? no more open bug reports |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
I already did that when I wrote it, actually there still is an open bug |
| 6 |
for it. So I guess you didn't actually go trough these proposed steps |
| 7 |
yourself. Anyway, it is completely besides the point, because you or |
| 8 |
anyone else won't check a week or a month from now if there's bug filed |
| 9 |
against cccc, that is what maintenance is about. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
> > I mean, you aren't the maintainer. And there is still the outstanding |
| 12 |
> > issue that it is unmaintained in Gentoo, are you going to fix that or |
| 13 |
> > not ? Otherwise it should be masked and removed. |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> this is the same argument as already made and rejected ... |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Where was this rejected and by whom ? By you I guess ? That just doesn't |
| 18 |
cut it, errors made in the past are no reason to make them again in the |
| 19 |
future. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
> feel free to mask |
| 22 |
> and remove the hundreds of other packages that have no maintainer |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
So now we do have your blessing ? cccc is then up for removal as of this |
| 25 |
moment. |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
- foser |
Archives