| 1 |
On Thu, 2005-03-31 at 08:27 -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Thursday 31 March 2005 08:17 am, Diego "Flameeyes" Pettenò wrote: |
| 3 |
> > I know this is there also for compatibility, but this makes sys-libs/pam |
| 4 |
> > ebuild very bloated as for now, and still I don't know a reason to have it |
| 5 |
> > there. |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> if you read pam-0.78-r2 and do a search in bugzilla, you'll see that |
| 8 |
> pam_console is no longer on by default |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> some people actually do want it, so ripping it out isnt very nice ;) |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
Well, as its with OpenPAM, and on bsd, I do not see an issue. I am for |
| 13 |
one not going to support OpenPAM on linux, and dont think we should .... |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
-- |
| 17 |
Martin Schlemmer |
| 18 |
Gentoo Linux Developer, Desktop/System Team Developer |
| 19 |
Cape Town, South Africa |
Archives