Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev <gentoo-dev@l.g.o>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] www-apps/otrs: needs new maintainer
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2015 00:38:06
Message-Id: CAGfcS_nbqc32mpQa8FeeTWCCa98MiXwDr6DzHaKUa8VYrCy4Fw@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] www-apps/otrs: needs new maintainer by "Robin H. Johnson"
1 On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 3:56 PM, Robin H. Johnson <robbat2@g.o> wrote:
2 > On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 02:13:34PM +0200, hasufell wrote:
3 >> On 09/15/2015 02:00 PM, Peter Stuge wrote:
4 >> > If you have interest in this package then you can do one or more of:
5 >> > * become a Gentoo developer (ha-ha)
6 >> hmm
7 > For background, SGW did work on becoming a developer once before, but he
8 > mainly found he was short on time to handle more than the packages that
9 > he had a business interest in.
10 >
11 > I used to proxy-commit changes from him to the Amanda package, but found
12 > myself short on time to test them as well in the long run.
13 >
14
15 To be constructive, a github pull-request is probably the most
16 effective way to get a proxy maintainer to notice your work right now
17 and commit it for you. Bugs assigned to proxy-maintainers@ might also
18 work. Believe it or not people will actually use ebuilds you attach
19 whether or not they get into the tree. Another option is to publish
20 your own overlay, and that makes a good foundation for a pull-request
21 anyway and it is easy to use for those who do want to use the overlay
22 directly.
23
24 And do consider signing up as a proxied maintainer for a package
25 you're interested in. If you do establish a long-term relationship
26 with a package it probably will make devs more willing to commit your
27 changes without a lot of testing on their part.
28
29 --
30 Rich

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] www-apps/otrs: needs new maintainer "Stefan G. Weichinger" <lists@×××××.at>