Archives
Archives
| From: | Ryan Hill <dirtyepic@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | [gentoo-dev] Re: virtualx eclass possible issue | ||
| Date: | Sun, 13 Mar 2011 05:21:17 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20110312232606.2f94020f@gentoo.org | ||
| In Reply to: | [gentoo-dev] virtualx eclass possible issue by "Paweł Hajdan | ||
| 1 | On Sat, 12 Mar 2011 11:37:28 +0100 |
| 2 | "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." <phajdan.jr@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 | |
| 4 | > Shouldn't that last line look more like this (notice $retval instead of $?): |
| 5 | > |
| 6 | > [[ $retval -ne 0 ]] && die "${FUNCNAME}: the ${VIRTALX_COMMAND} failed." |
| 7 | |
| 8 | Sure looks like it to me. |
| 9 | |
| 10 | |
| 11 | -- |
| 12 | fonts, gcc-porting, it makes no sense how it makes no sense |
| 13 | toolchain, wxwidgets but i'll take it free anytime |
| 14 | @ gentoo.org EFFD 380E 047A 4B51 D2BD C64F 8AA8 8346 F9A4 0662 |
| File name | MIME type |
|---|---|
| signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |