Archives
Archives
| From: | Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | "vivo75@×××××.com" <vivo75@×××××.com> | ||
| Cc: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Shall econf append its arguments to end of ./configure invocation? | ||
| Date: | Tue, 30 Apr 2013 11:47:19 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20130430124658.3e7239a1@googlemail.com | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Shall econf append its arguments to end of ./configure invocation? by "vivo75@gmail.com" |
||
| 1 | On Tue, 30 Apr 2013 13:42:22 +0200 |
| 2 | "vivo75@×××××.com" <vivo75@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 3 | > Now, is it possible to alter the behaviour of paludis to act, still |
| 4 | > following the specs, in a way compatible with portage and which seem |
| 5 | > more logical to the majority of people writing this thread? |
| 6 | |
| 7 | Sure, and as an added bonus, we can do that selectively from EAPI 6 |
| 8 | onwards, avoiding the need to introduce a breaking change to the spec. |
| 9 | |
| 10 | -- |
| 11 | Ciaran McCreesh |
| File name | MIME type |
|---|---|
| signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Shall econf append its arguments to end of ./configure invocation? | Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o> |