Archives
Archives
| From: | Gilles Dartiguelongue <eva@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Automated Package Removal and Addition Tracker, for the week ending 2010-05-09 23h59 UTC | ||
| Date: | Mon, 10 May 2010 09:36:35 | ||
| Message-Id: | 1273484146.21605.5.camel@gdartigu.lan.rep.sj | ||
| In Reply to: | [gentoo-dev] Automated Package Removal and Addition Tracker, for the week ending 2010-05-09 23h59 UTC by "Robin H. Johnson" |
||
| 1 | Le lundi 10 mai 2010 à 00:15 +0000, Robin H. Johnson a écrit : |
| 2 | > The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed |
| 3 | > from the tree, for the week ending 2010-05-09 23h59 UTC. |
| 4 | > |
| 5 | > Removals: |
| 6 | > gnome-base/gail 2010-05-03 22:28:28 ssuominen |
| 7 | |
| 8 | Erm, when this package got last-rited ? |
| 9 | |
| 10 | I see bug 299456 [1] was closed but no entry anywhere it went the usual |
| 11 | way [2]. Is QA allowed to ignore policy when it sees fit (as in gail is |
| 12 | now part of gtk+) ? I don't think it's good to introduce corner cases in |
| 13 | a simple policy like that. |
| 14 | |
| 15 | [1] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=299456 |
| 16 | [2] |
| 17 | http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/devrel/handbook/handbook.xml?part=2&chap=5#doc_chap8 |
| 18 | -- |
| 19 | Gilles Dartiguelongue <eva@g.o> |
| 20 | Gentoo |