| 1 |
On Thu, 2004-04-22 at 14:50, Stuart Herbert wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Thursday 22 April 2004 22:35, Scott W Taylor wrote: |
| 3 |
> > So, it is probably not the thing to add to repoman, |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> Must disagree here ;-) |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> At the moment, repoman is the main ebuild lint tool. Why add a second tool to |
| 8 |
> perform QA on ebuilds before they are submitted - especially when there's |
| 9 |
> enough trouble getting people to use repoman? |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> Best regards, |
| 12 |
> Stu |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Generally I agree -- I think ALL developers NEED to use repoman |
| 15 |
regardless (and enforced server side, if it must be). However, I think |
| 16 |
gentoolkit-dev could use an "emove" utility which does the moving and |
| 17 |
linting of dependencies. Since every move requires source, target, |
| 18 |
listing of source and target in the updates file (which can be autogen'd |
| 19 |
if it doesn't exist, depending on today's date), and the dependencies, |
| 20 |
the utility can automate all that. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
Ciao, |
| 23 |
-- |
| 24 |
Seemant Kulleen |
| 25 |
http://dev.gentoo.org/~seemant |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
Public Key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x3458780E |
| 28 |
Key fingerprint = 23A9 7CB5 9BBB 4F8D 549B 6593 EDA2 65D8 3458 780E |
Archives