| 1 |
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 08:13:51PM +0400, Hobbit wrote: |
| 2 |
> > Why should we care about ancient filesystems that didn't supported |
| 3 |
> > long paths, and therefore we got stuck with /usr since we didn't |
| 4 |
> > wanted to waste another *single* character to make it /user? |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> Because of it's original name: "UNIX System Resources" (usr). |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
Actually this is not correct (see my earlier post with the link to |
| 9 |
osnews.com). |
| 10 |
Originally it contained user directories like /home does now. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
William |
Archives