| 1 |
On Tue, 2012-05-15 at 18:38 -0400, Walter Dnes wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 11:26:03AM -0700, Greg KH wrote |
| 3 |
> > What specifically is your objection to udev today? Is it doing things |
| 4 |
> > you don't like? Too big? Something else? |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> Today, it requires an initramfs if /usr is not physically on /. That |
| 7 |
> is due in large part to the fact that it has been rolled into the |
| 8 |
> systemd tarball, and inherited some of systemd's code and limitations, |
| 9 |
> despite the fact that udev is still a separate binary. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
This is absolutely and definitely false. Where did you hear such |
| 12 |
nonsense ? |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
-- |
| 16 |
Stelian Ionescu a.k.a. fe[nl]ix |
| 17 |
Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum videtur. |
| 18 |
http://common-lisp.net/project/iolib |
Archives