1 |
Yuri Vasilevski wrote: |
2 |
[...] |
3 |
> But at the benefit of having less confusion |
4 |
> for users about "What the heck is a GPL-2+?" for at last the same period |
5 |
> of time. |
6 |
[...] |
7 |
> So users will have to check what's the |
8 |
> meaning of that + at the end of GPL-2+, so I think it'll create much |
9 |
> more confusion than the work of updating packages with each new version |
10 |
> of GPL. |
11 |
|
12 |
I think naming them "GPL-2-only" and "GPL-2-or-later" will fix this issue, |
13 |
especially if the note mentioned by Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò will be added. |
14 |
If someone is really interested in knowing more about licenses or GPL he is |
15 |
likely to already know the "GPL 2 or later"-thing, while those not interested |
16 |
in it anyway are likely not to ask :-) |
17 |
|
18 |
Maybe the question arising could be: |
19 |
Did the author say "or later version" or did he say "or any later version" as |
20 |
maybe (IANAL) it means only "2.*" without that 'any' |
21 |
Something like that would make sense as I would want my software to be |
22 |
licensed under 2.* since they should be compatible but include "fixes" if a |
23 |
passage is unclear or creates problems in one or the other jurisdiction. |
24 |
|
25 |
Stefan Schweizer wrote: |
26 |
> I see little benifit in having GPL-2+ but a lot of potential confusion and a |
27 |
> lot of work for developers to check all pkges. |
28 |
What about creating a bug depending on some 11600 others for each package |
29 |
until it is fixed? (kidding) |
30 |
I agree on that, benefit would be rather small. IF a user really needs to |
31 |
know, wether it is 2.* or also a later version at his opinion it would for |
32 |
sure not be a problem to just look it up. |
33 |
|
34 |
On the other hand, changing the license should, if at all, be done rather at |
35 |
once than stepwise to avoid an inconsistend sceme, as I think this is what |
36 |
would create confusion... |
37 |
|
38 |
|
39 |
Ciao, |
40 |
|
41 |
Daniel |
42 |
|
43 |
-- |
44 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |