1 |
On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 11:45 AM Alec Warner <antarus@g.o> wrote: |
2 |
> |
3 |
> On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 1:59 AM Mikle Kolyada <zlogene@g.o> wrote: |
4 |
>> |
5 |
>> |
6 |
>> On 10.09.2020 08:35, Hans de Graaff wrote: |
7 |
>> > On Wed, 2020-09-09 at 13:35 +0300, Mikle Kolyada wrote: |
8 |
>> >> Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/741380 |
9 |
>> > Could you provide a rationale for removing this? The bug only has a |
10 |
>> > single anecdotal report of a user who can run a desktop without it. I'm |
11 |
>> > not sure if that is reason enough to remove this. I guess we won't be |
12 |
>> > able to figure out easily how many of our desktop profile users are |
13 |
>> > actually using LDAP, but changing this may cause surprises and I'm not |
14 |
>> > sure if that's warranted. |
15 |
>> > |
16 |
>> > Hans |
17 |
>> |
18 |
>> |
19 |
>> Hi. |
20 |
>> |
21 |
>> It is dictated by common sense. |
22 |
>> |
23 |
>> |
24 |
>> I barely can imagine a case where you need ldap support in each and |
25 |
>> every package you install. |
26 |
> |
27 |
> |
28 |
> I can, but not in a desktop environment. In an enterprise environment you will need it (but I'd expect folks to add it.) |
29 |
> The challenge is just in changing the default. E.g. we might not do it until a new profile bump (e.g. do it in a 2020 or 2021 profile?) |
30 |
|
31 |
I think a news item with some time delay would be sufficient to inform |
32 |
any enterprise admins so they can push a local config change. |