| 1 |
Wow... It's exactly the same idea! I do not had any idea that this |
| 2 |
already exists! Not even the GLEP. I'll take some time reading it and |
| 3 |
maybe contributing to it. |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
Thanks! |
| 6 |
I'm very proud with the Gentoo dev community! Really impressive job! |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
On 7/21/05, Danny van Dyk <kugelfang@g.o> wrote: |
| 9 |
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 10 |
> Hash: SHA1 |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> Hi Herbert, |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> Herbert Fischer schrieb: |
| 15 |
> | ... |
| 16 |
> | |
| 17 |
> | I suggest the creation of a "USE flags grouping mechanism" to help the |
| 18 |
> | decision making of configuring make.conf when doing initial setup or |
| 19 |
> | ... |
| 20 |
> You mean GLEP 29[1] ??? |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> Danny |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
> [1] http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/glep/glep-0029.html |
| 25 |
> |
| 26 |
> - -- |
| 27 |
> Danny van Dyk <kugelfang@g.o> |
| 28 |
> Gentoo/AMD64 Project, Gentoo Scientific Project |
| 29 |
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 30 |
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) |
| 31 |
> |
| 32 |
> iD8DBQFC4BQRaVNL8NrtU6IRAlZWAJ0d/FETszbWiajqUOyD2DkE55TNKwCgjBaS |
| 33 |
> R9rHIXXakiaOKaf0fSBxBWg= |
| 34 |
> =QBfL |
| 35 |
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 36 |
> -- |
| 37 |
> gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
| 38 |
> |
| 39 |
> |
| 40 |
|
| 41 |
-- |
| 42 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives