| 1 |
On Mon, 2005-12-09 at 20:50 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Mon, 12 Sep 2005 21:39:48 +0200 Simon Stelling <blubb@g.o> |
| 3 |
> wrote: |
| 4 |
> | This has been in the todo-list for quite a while, but finally it's |
| 5 |
> | done. I'm curious what you think of it. |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> Could we get some numbers? How many arch testers have gone to become |
| 8 |
> official developers? How many have disappeared without trace? How many |
| 9 |
> stuck around but didn't do much? |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
Here is the list of AT's, current and past. Those marked active are |
| 12 |
really active. And most of them joined in the last 2-3 months. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/base/amd64/tests/index.xml?part=1&chap=1 |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
Btw, do we want to be voters in the council elections? I'm not sure they |
| 17 |
should be given a more official status. But giving easier access to |
| 18 |
developership if they have done a good job as ATs should definitely be |
| 19 |
considered. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
-- |
| 22 |
Olivier Crête |
| 23 |
tester@g.o |
| 24 |
Gentoo Developer |
| 25 |
x86 Security Liaison |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
-- |
| 29 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives