Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Kristian Fiskerstrand <k_f@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o, Michael Palimaka <kensington@g.o>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: taking a break from arches stabilization
Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2017 12:30:51
Message-Id: 75c94306-b7f5-03a3-fd8e-8b883f43d0f9@gentoo.org
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] Re: taking a break from arches stabilization by Michael Palimaka
1 On 07/12/2017 01:59 PM, Michael Palimaka wrote:
2 > If it's not a stable candidate then why do you use this as an example
3 > against build testing-based stabilisations? If there are known issues it
4 > should never reach the arch teams in the first place.
5
6 This might be the crux of things, as long as automatic stabilization is
7 not triggered by some set of rules (e.g 30 days in ~arch) , and still
8 requires manual trigger by, preferably, the maintainer there is likely
9 no issue.
10
11 --
12 Kristian Fiskerstrand
13 OpenPGP keyblock reachable at hkp://pool.sks-keyservers.net
14 fpr:94CB AFDD 3034 5109 5618 35AA 0B7F 8B60 E3ED FAE3

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: taking a break from arches stabilization William Hubbs <williamh@g.o>