1 |
On Saturday 15 March 2008, Donnie Berkholz wrote: |
2 |
> On 06:03 Sun 09 Mar , Rajiv Aaron Manglani (rajiv) wrote: |
3 |
> > 1.1 sys-power/nut/nut-2.2.1.ebuild |
4 |
> > |
5 |
> > file : |
6 |
> > http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/sys-power/nut/nut-2.2.1.e |
7 |
> >build?rev=1.1&view=markup plain: |
8 |
> > http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/sys-power/nut/nut-2.2.1.e |
9 |
> >build?rev=1.1&content-type=text/plain |
10 |
> > |
11 |
> > src_install() { |
12 |
> |
13 |
> ... |
14 |
> |
15 |
> > eval fperms 0640 ${NUT_PRIVATE_FILES} |
16 |
> > eval fowners root:nut ${NUT_PRIVATE_FILES} |
17 |
> > |
18 |
> > eval fperms 0644 ${NUT_PUBLIC_FILES} |
19 |
> > eval fowners root:root ${NUT_PUBLIC_FILES} |
20 |
> |
21 |
> ... |
22 |
> |
23 |
> > pkg_postinst() { |
24 |
> > # this is to ensure that everybody that installed old versions still has |
25 |
> > # correct permissions |
26 |
> > |
27 |
> > chown nut:nut "${ROOT}"/var/lib/nut 2>/dev/null |
28 |
> > chmod 0700 "${ROOT}"/var/lib/nut 2>/dev/null |
29 |
> > |
30 |
> > eval chown root:nut "${ROOT}"${NUT_PRIVATE_FILES} 2>/dev/null |
31 |
> > eval chmod 0640 "${ROOT}"${NUT_PRIVATE_FILES} 2>/dev/null |
32 |
> > |
33 |
> > eval chown root:root "${ROOT}"${NUT_PUBLIC_FILES} 2>/dev/null |
34 |
> > eval chmod 0644 "${ROOT}"${NUT_PUBLIC_FILES} 2>/dev/null |
35 |
> |
36 |
> Is there any reason why eval is used in either of these places? |
37 |
|
38 |
i'd open a bug so it doesnt get lost |
39 |
-mike |