Archives
Archives
| From: | Peter Volkov <pva@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grab | ||
| Date: | Mon, 17 Nov 2008 08:40:15 | ||
| Message-Id: | 1226911201.29440.13.camel@localhost | ||
| In Reply to: | [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grab by Gilles Dartiguelongue |
||
| 1 | В Вск, 16/11/2008 в 21:13 +0100, Gilles Dartiguelongue пишет: |
| 2 | > here is a list of packages gnome herd would like to get rid of since |
| 3 | > no-one seem to take care of them and users are not so verbose about it |
| 4 | > either: |
| 5 | > |
| 6 | > * app-text/ggv https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=223427 |
| 7 | |
| 8 | Upstream there was a discussion of interest. Pointing at random mail in |
| 9 | that tread: |
| 10 | http://mail.gnome.org/archives/gnome-hackers/2006-July/msg00008.html |
| 11 | So there are people which prefer ggv over evince... |
| 12 | |
| 13 | > * net-news/straw https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=187285 |
| 14 | |
| 15 | This bug is already fixed since straw-0.27 is in the tree. |
| 16 | |
| 17 | > * net-news/logjam https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=181236 |
| 18 | |
| 19 | > If no-one takes them, I'll proceed to package removal. |
| 20 | |
| 21 | This are the cases where removal is not a best solution. straw and |
| 22 | logjam have upstream so it's better to move them into Sunrise: users who |
| 23 | use this packages could maintain them there... For ggv it seems that |
| 24 | it's better to leave it as is. May be just stabilize the most recent |
| 25 | version - let arch teams test it and if it works no need to remove it |
| 26 | from the tree. |
| 27 | |
| 28 | -- |
| 29 | Peter. |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grab | "Rémi Cardona" <remi@g.o> |