| 1 |
On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 9:49 PM, Michael Palimaka <kensington@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 14/11/14 15:01, Rich Freeman wrote: |
| 3 |
>> |
| 4 |
>> And I do apologize for piling on a bit - trying to get rid of @system |
| 5 |
>> has been one of my soap box issues for a while. It really seems like |
| 6 |
>> an ugly, if practical, solution. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> I think the proposed text in my previous reply is an improvement on the |
| 9 |
> current text. It certainly doesn't attempt to solve the problem of |
| 10 |
> implicit dependencies 100%, but I don't think that's a good reason to |
| 11 |
> avoid improvement. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
Hence my last comment. :) |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
I don't have a problem with the change. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
-- |
| 18 |
Rich |
Archives