Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Riyad Kalla <rsk@×××××××××.edu>
To: gentoo-dev@g.o
Subject: RE: [gentoo-dev] Nvidia GLX source
Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2003 15:43:14
Message-Id: 000301c2cdf5$5d1f5010$d628c480@rskwork
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Nvidia GLX source by Ingo Krabbe
1 41xx is stable. Their leaked drivers (windows) are in the 42 and I
2 *think* 43 range already.
3
4 > -----Original Message-----
5 > From: Ingo Krabbe [mailto:i.krabbe@×××××.net]
6 > Sent: Thursday, February 06, 2003 2:29 AM
7 > To: gentoo-dev@g.o
8 > Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Nvidia GLX source
9 >
10 >
11 > So guys you are asking why it is called a source rpm ? Well
12 > it isn't a binary package also, so they call it a source.
13 >
14 > Don't complain about missing sources. Nvidia just want to
15 > earn some money by hiding some edges of their technology.
16 > Don't blame me for it, neither blame them. They do their
17 > work good, don't they ?
18 >
19 > Anyway it actually is source. There where some bugs in a GLX
20 > source module long time ago. I could fix that by editing the
21 > glx header where you can enable and disable GL options when
22 > somethings don't work.
23 >
24 > Just track the problem down or install the older version.
25 > Isn't the 41XX stuff a development version ?
26 >
27 > BYE INGO
28 >
29 >
30 > --
31 > gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list
32 >
33
34
35 --
36 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list