Re: [gentoo-dev] net-proxy herd is still looking for help (was: Re: [gentoo-dev] net-proxy herd is empty)

[Bertrand Jacquin]

On 2013-09-01 16:01, Tom Wijsman wrote:
> On Sun, 3 Mar 2013 21:00:19 +0200
> Pavlos Ratis <dastergon@g.o> wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Mar 3, 2013 at 6:16 PM, Tom Wijsman <TomWij@g.o> wrote:
>> > On Sun, 03 Mar 2013 17:00:57 +0100
>> > Pacho Ramos <pacho@g.o> wrote:
>> >
>> >> As wschlich no longer has enough time for that packages, this herd
>> >> is now empty. If you want to help, please join the herd. If nobody
>> >> joins, I will proceed with dropping it and moving its packages
>> >> maintainer-needed letting everybody want the packages they prefer.
>> >
>> > Not joining until others join because I don't want to be the sole
>> > herd member, but I do want to help out with occasional bumps and
>> > such if there clearly is a case of lack of manpower.
>> >
>> > I'm also interested in stepping up as a maintainer for
>> > net-proxy/privoxy.
>>
>> I am interested in joining the herd. Now we can be 2 members. :)
>
> While I joined under the above premise to help out I have became the
> main maintainer but am unable to cover everything this herd does;
> Pavlos didn't have much time either to together cover everything.
>
> So, we currently have around 48 bugs open at the moment; there are
> also probably some versions bumps waiting as well, as well as some of
> the other maintaining tasks that possibly come along.
>
> If you want to help, please join the herd. If nobody joins, we will
> likely proceed with dropping it in a month and moving its packages
> to maintainer-needed letting everybody want the packages they prefer.

Can be in as a proxied maintainer as net-proxy is something I'm 
interested in as other net- stuff.

> Another option is to combine the net herds together into a bigger net
> herd, as I have previously suggested; we might need to look into that.