Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Pacho Ramos <pacho@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] About wormo's situation?
Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2010 10:06:46
Message-Id: 1284716029.6406.0.camel@localhost.localdomain
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] About wormo's situation? by Jeremy Olexa
1 El jue, 16-09-2010 a las 16:20 -0500, Jeremy Olexa escribió:
2 > On Thu, 16 Sep 2010 23:12:10 +0200, Pacho Ramos <pacho@g.o>
3 > wrote:
4 > > Hello
5 > >
6 > > I have seen some package metadatas still referring to wormo as their
7 > > maintainer:
8 > > $ grep -r wormo */*/metada*
9 > > app-admin/ulogd/metadata.xml: <email>wormo@g.o</email>
10 > > app-arch/pdv/metadata.xml: <email>wormo@g.o</email>
11 > > www-client/lynx/metadata.xml: <email>wormo@g.o</email>
12 > >
13 > >
14 > > But, reading http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=72682 looks like she
15 > > retired some time ago. What is her real situation? Should that packages
16 > > be moved to maintainer-needed (if nobody cares about them)?
17 > >
18 > > Please note that this problem appeared because a user mailed us about
19 > > some unresolved problem with ulogd since a lot of time.
20 > >
21 > > Thanks a lot for clarifying this :-)
22 >
23 > Quote from bug: "..increase her activity by proxy-maintaining some
24 > packages" and
25 > http://bugs.gentoo.org/custom_userhistory.cgi?matchstr=wormo@g.o
26 > shows recent activity. So, I don't know..have you tried contacting her
27 > via direct email? :) Otherwise if there is no action on bugs, I'd wager
28 > that it is 'ok' for you to fix - especially if you communicate and
29 > willing to fix what you break.
30 >
31 > -Jeremy
32 >
33 >
34
35 OK, sorry for the inconvenience (also to jlec, that has also replied to
36 this), I misinterpreted wormo retirement bug report
37
38 Thanks for your help

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature