Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Greg Turner <gmt@×××××.us>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Is || ( Atom... ) broken?
Date: Wed, 09 Jul 2014 18:26:31
Message-Id: CA+VB3NQFaV5fqC9wq+=TqoKPpz94B4OZpMXFdQpWpCWjJ0EMTw@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] Re: Is || ( Atom... ) broken? by Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net>
1 On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 5:34 AM, Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@×××.net> wrote:
2 > Have you /tried/ backtrack=0?
3
4 Yeah. I had backtrack=1 as my default for a good while before my
5 overlay started getting cray-cray. It's fast -- well, less slow -- but
6 diagnostically unhelpful when anything goes "wrong".
7
8 I guess, specifically, the things it deals with poorly are:
9
10 * precisely the issue I started this thread about (first option in
11 dependency disjunction not a match)
12
13 * ebuild A matches dependency of selected ebuild B, but is rejected by
14 selected ebuild C, which requires A', A' < A
15
16 * trying to switch between packages solving a virtual
17
18 * probably more stuff....
19
20 -gmt