1 |
Quoth foser (Wed 2004-05-19 01:30:00PM +0200): |
2 |
|
3 |
> On Tue, 2004-05-18 at 21:08 +0100, Stuart Herbert wrote: |
4 |
> |
5 |
> > I'm pro-choice, and do not agree with the idea of aggregating USE flags just |
6 |
> > because they sound similar. |
7 |
> |
8 |
> The second time you mention choice. I guess we know what Gentoo is about |
9 |
> by now, the 'choice' argument is too often used just to end criticism. |
10 |
> |
11 |
> Choice is an illusion, if you there's too much choice it is no use to |
12 |
> anyone anymore, because nobody really knows what it is all about. This |
13 |
> is already the case with the loads of USE flags/portage options/etc. we |
14 |
> have. Gentoo shouldn't be about choice for the sake of it, it should be |
15 |
> about simplicity/managability : stuff that works. It's a trade-off. |
16 |
|
17 |
That is ridiculous. Speaking from personal experience, choice is exactly |
18 |
what drew me to Gentoo--I could have it *just* how I wanted it. Thus, |
19 |
choice is *not* an illusion, it is vital to many advanced users who |
20 |
have chosen Gentoo for just that reason. |
21 |
|
22 |
The way to achieve "simplicity/managability : stuff that works" is |
23 |
through reasonable defaults. Look at all the USE flags that xfree or |
24 |
xemacs use. Quite a glut. However, the defaults are almost always what |
25 |
I need. If I care enough, I can run 'equery uses' to find out what the |
26 |
more esoteric flags do, and select or deselect flags based on that. |
27 |
|
28 |
If I want things to Just Work(TM), I accept the Gentoo defaults, |
29 |
knowing that the devs would never lead me down the wrong path. :) |
30 |
|
31 |
|
32 |
-- |
33 |
Josh Glover |
34 |
|
35 |
Gentoo Developer (http://dev.gentoo.org/~jmglov/) |
36 |
Tokyo Linux Users Group Listmaster (http://www.tlug.jp/) |
37 |
|
38 |
GPG keyID 0xDE8A3103 (C3E4 FA9E 1E07 BBDB 6D8B 07AB 2BF1 67A1 DE8A 3103) |
39 |
gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys DE8A3103 |