| 1 |
On Friday 26 May 2006 13:02, Martin Ehmsen wrote: |
| 2 |
> We are currently considering using the same approach as with the |
| 3 |
> perl packages (using new-style virtuals), but I guess thats on hold until |
| 4 |
> it is okay to introduce additional new-style virtuals? |
| 5 |
As long as the name does not clash with the name of the package (perl prefixes |
| 6 |
the names with "perl-") you are fine, so if you |
| 7 |
have "virtual/tex-latex-beamer" you should be fine :) |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
I would support this approach btw, especially if you're going with a split way |
| 10 |
to add TeX sources, as seems more finegrained :) |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
> Comments, suggestions, offers of help, anything would be useful :) |
| 13 |
Count on me for testing, and for ~amd64 and ~x86-fbsd marking when needed ;) |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
-- |
| 16 |
Diego "Flameeyes" Pettenò - http://farragut.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org/ |
| 17 |
Gentoo/Alt lead, Gentoo/FreeBSD, Video, AMD64, Sound, PAM, KDE |
Archives