1 |
On Tue, 7 Jun 2011 17:45:03 -0400 |
2 |
Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
|
4 |
> On Tuesday, June 07, 2011 17:36:59 Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
5 |
> > On Tue, 7 Jun 2011 17:35:11 -0400 Mike Frysinger wrote: |
6 |
> > > > And yes, it should be automated. I agree. Doesn't change the |
7 |
> > > > current situation. |
8 |
> > > |
9 |
> > > of course it does. it makes the current situation irrelevant. |
10 |
> > |
11 |
> > Does this mean we should shortly be expecting to see you do the |
12 |
> > work to migrate the tree to Git and to automate ChangeLog |
13 |
> > generation? |
14 |
> |
15 |
> the tree has already been migrated. automatic ChangeLog generation |
16 |
> is trivial to implement, and many many projects already have scripts |
17 |
> to do it. |
18 |
|
19 |
Including portage's egencache which can generate ChangeLogs from git. |
20 |
Just a side note. |
21 |
|
22 |
-- |
23 |
Best regards, |
24 |
Michał Górny |