Archives
Archives
| From: | "Andrew D. Fant" <jfmuggs@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@××××××××××××.org | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] category sci-geosciences redundant ? | ||
| Date: | Thu, 17 Mar 2005 02:24:36 | ||
| Message-Id: | 4238E95C.9000405@gentoo.org | ||
| In Reply to: | [gentoo-dev] category sci-geosciences redundant ? by Mike Frysinger |
||
| 1 | -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 | Hash: SHA1 |
| 3 | |
| 4 | Mike Frysinger wrote: |
| 5 | | is it just me or does it seem redundant to have 'sciences' at the end |
| 6 | of a |
| 7 | | sci-* category ? wouldnt it make more sense as just 'sci-geo' ? |
| 8 | |
| 9 | Would sci-geo be geography or geology or geosciences? |
| 10 | |
| 11 | Andy |
| 12 | |
| 13 | |
| 14 | -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 15 | Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux) |
| 16 | Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org |
| 17 | |
| 18 | iD8DBQFCOOlbOq80mJ2AvM0RAutfAJ4t1A1mViGYXvjeBB1WmGB+lAUjigCfSEEh |
| 19 | 9xNfRgBhhBNhZz9FlA4Ysvc= |
| 20 | =yVXK |
| 21 | -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 22 | -- |
| 23 | gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] category sci-geosciences redundant ? | Dan Meltzer <parallelgrapefruit@×××××.com> |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] category sci-geosciences redundant ? | Georgi Georgiev <chutz@×××.net> |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] category sci-geosciences redundant ? | "Stephen P. Becker" <geoman@g.o> |