Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Alex Legler <a3li@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] About changing security policy to unCC maintainers when their are not needed
Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2012 13:49:37
Message-Id: 5051E41C.1060809@gentoo.org
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] About changing security policy to unCC maintainers when their are not needed by Pacho Ramos
1 On 12.09.2012 19:59, Pacho Ramos wrote:
2 > Hello
3 >
4 > Currently, package maintainers are CCed to security bugs when their are
5 > needed. The problem is that, once maintainers add a fixed version and
6 > tell security team they are ok to get it stabilized, maintainers are
7 > kept CCed until bug is closed by security team. This usually means
8 > getting a lot of mail after some time when security team discuss if a
9 > GLSA should be filled or not, if security bot adds some comment... some
10 > of that comments are applied to really old bugs that need no action from
11 > maintainers.
12 >
13 > Maybe would be interesting to change the policy to unCC maintainers
14 > again when their action is no longer required.
15 >
16 > What do you think?
17
18 Sorta OT but a general thing: I think you should CC teams you want to
19 talk to and not only use the gentoo-systemd-flamewars^W^W-dev mailing
20 list where these teams might only find your post by chance.
21
22 >
23 > Thanks for your thoughts
24 >
25 --
26 Alex Legler <a3li@g.o>
27 Gentoo Security/Ruby/Infrastructure

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies